Utilising scientific data for banyan pest control
2023-06-09
| Dr. Caroline Law, Board Governor, Friends of the Earth (HK)
In mid-May, on
my routine walk down Tai Chung Kiu Road outside Hong Kong Heritage Museum, I
noticed that the leaves of a banyan tree had almost completely disappeared. At
first, I was wondering if drilling works earlier had damaged its main root
system. Upon closer inspection, I spotted brownish debris and chewed leaves
underneath the tree with moth larvae crawling on the trunk—evidence that the
tree was in the initial stage of Phauda
flammans larvae infestation.
Since 2020, Phauda flammans have been threatening Ficus spp. trees and shrubs as defoliator in Hong Kong. Their
larvae only feed on the leaves and young petioles of banyan trees, such as
Chinese Banyan, Weeping Fig, Big-leaved Fig and Mountain Fig. Although this
moth species is widely distributed in South China and Southeast Asia since the
early 20th century, no major outbreaks were recorded in Hong Kong before
2019-20. Initially discovered in Tin Shui Wai and Yuen Long, Phauda flammans have been breeding on
banyan trees in urban area for the past 2-3 years. And by the first half of
this year, only Hong Kong Island, East Kowloon, Tseung Kwan O, South Lantau and
other outlying islands have been left untouched by pest outbreaks. Phauda flammans are highly fertile, producing
an average of 3-4 generations of offspring per year. If no measures are taken
to prevent their spread, it will sooner or later affect the high-risk
century-old banyan trees and the iconic stonewall trees on Hong Kong Island.
Some people
may ask, "Everything in the world reinforces and counteracts each other, don’t Phauda flammanshave their natural predators too?”
After years of observation by horticulturists and arborists, the number of
local predators, such as Gotra octocincta(parasitic wasps) and Oecophylla
smaragdina (weaver ants), is far from effective in controlling Phauda flammans population. In addition, their toxicity prevents them
from being eaten by birds. Some may argue that banyan trees are very vigorous
and resilient, so why the alarmist talk? Why go to all the trouble and expense
of exterminating pests at taxpayers’ expense when the banyan trees are able to
sustain and regenerate themselves?
I would like
to raise a few potential concerns and considerations here:
1. Many of the old banyan trees (such as the ones on Park
Lane Shopper's Boulevard) are currently infected with brown root rot disease
and listed on the Register of Old & Valuable Trees. Will they succumb to tree
decline when faced with recurring pest infestation in the future?
2. Old banyan trees and stonewall trees along roadsides
with heavy pedestrian and vehicular traffic tend to have poorer regeneration
capacity. Repeated infestations by multiple generations of larvae can cause defoliation
and reduce the trees’ ability to replenish food reserves, leading to dieback. Tree management personnel may
increase the magnitude and frequency of pruning and crown reduction as a
result. Under such vicious cycle, will the capacity for tree regeneration be
gradually depleted?
3. According to my research study, Chinese Banyan
accounts for approximately 6% of tree number in Hong Kong’s public green space,
which is considered the most common banyan tree species. If the government and concerned
sectors fail to implement systematic pest control strategies, old and declining
banyan trees will die gradually, followed by other banyan trees planted in
unfavourable growing environment.
4. The first to be affected are the old (or veteran)
banyan trees in older districts. Their wide canopies are effective in
mitigating urban heat island effect and facilitating carbon and nitrogen
cycles. They also provide essential breeding grounds and habitats for mutualism
species such as fig wasp, which in turn affect the food sources of their
predators.
5.It is nature's
law that infested and diseased banyan trees would gradually decline without
intervention or treatment, but the general public has deep connection and
collective memory for these iconic banyan trees. Therefore, we can conduct a
public opinion survey with "Yes/No treatment” cost initiatives for the public
to express whether it is worthwhile to allocate resources for this purpose. It
is worth noting that the cost of non-treatment includes tree removal and
replanting, while the loss of respective ecosystem services is difficult to
quantify.
Simulation
models for pest management scenarios
In a review
paper of tree pests in urban areas around the world, 49 studies demonstrated
that tree pests had significantly weakened the trees and accelerated their
mortality[1].
To scientifically assess the impact of Phauda flammans, we can deploy mathematical simulation models to
estimate the decline and mortality of Ficus trees, as well as to compare
the input required for pest control management under different weather
conditions and scenarios in the future.
As pest
infestations continue to spread, the chances of using chemical pesticides for
pest control become higher. It is likely that highly toxic substances would creep
into the urban ecosystem, bringing harm to the environment and humans. To
prevent this from happening, the government must develop integrated pest
control guidelines, prioritise physical and biological pest control strategies,
and strictly prohibit the use of pesticides with high toxicity, so as to
protect the ecological environment and the health of humans and animals.