【綠色金融網誌2024年秋季特別篇】ISSB可持續報告2024: 新加坡和香港證券交易所之比較

Alexandra Tracy香港地球之友綠色金融顧問

近日,筆者到訪新加坡出席RI Asia會議,獲益良多。會議期間,再次印證了一個現象:兩地業界一向喜歡互相參照和借鑑。監管機構尤為如此。回想當年筆者在港交所上市委員會任職時,我們會時刻關注新交所的最新動向。

當前,可持續發展披露的規管領域正經歷重大變革。新的標準制定機構相繼成立、新的專業術語不斷湧現,加上新規則將影響全球數以千計的企業。此刻,正是檢視兩地在這方面的發展進程並進行相互比較的最佳時機。

統一標準的新方向:ISSB的誕生

2021年氣候峰會(COP 26)上,國際可持續發展準則理事會(ISSB)應運而生,為業界帶來了重大突破。這標誌着過往五花八門的自願披露計劃將告一段落,取而代之的是一個更完善的全球匯報框架。ISSB以現有框架為基礎,特別參考了氣候相關財務披露工作組的成果,著手制定高質量、統一化的可持續發展披露準則。

截至2023年中,ISSB推出首兩項重要準則:涵蓋一般可持續發展事項的IFRS S1,以及針對氣候議題的IFRS S2。這些準則旨在為全球可持續發展披露建立基準標準,各地決策者可根據當地情況靈活採納,或結合本地要求進行調整。

港交所率先採納ISSB準則

在ISSB準則的採納進程中,港交所可謂領先同儕。今年四月,港交所就加強ESG報告框架中的氣候相關披露發表諮詢總結,並宣佈將其改稱為「ESG報告守則」。新規定將於2025年1月起分階段實施,其中主板上市公司必須強制披露範圍1及範圍2的溫室氣體排放。同時,企業需根據「不遵守就解釋」原則披露氣候相關風險與機遇、管治、策略、風險管理,以及指標和目標。至於範圍3的溫室氣體排放,雖然同樣採用「不遵守就解釋」機制,但大型上市公司須於2026年1月起強制披露,而GEM上市公司則採取自願披露形式。

新交所擴大規管範圍 涵蓋非上市企業

新交所於今年9月就其可持續發展匯報制度發表諮詢總結,當中加入ISSB的氣候相關要求。根據新增的披露規定,自2025財年起,所有上市公司須按照ISSB的氣候相關要求提供資訊,並強制披露範圍1及範圍2的溫室氣體排放。其他「主要項目」則可根據「不遵守就解釋」原則再延後一年。至於範圍3的溫室氣體排放,新交所表示將待評估企業的準備情況及實施經驗後,才制定具體的時間表。

值得注意的是,新加坡開創亞洲先河,計劃要求大型非上市企業須同樣作出強制性氣候相關披露。此規定涵蓋連續兩個財政年度內,年收入達10億新元及總資產超過5億新元的企業。自2027財年起,相關企業須向新加坡會計與企業管理局呈交年度氣候披露報告。

Dec 2024 Events on Green Finance / 2024年12月綠色金融活動一覽

Discover engaging green finance events this December 2024. Browse the calendar and register for events that align with your interests through the links below:

以上一圖看清2024年12月精彩的綠色金融活動!如欲參加及了解活動詳情,歡迎瀏覽以下網址:

2 Dec [1] FoE (HK) COP Series: Asia-Pacific COP29 Roundtable

3 Dec [2] The Green Economy: Key trends and why it matters

5 Dec [3] The 12th China SIF Annual Conference

5 Dec [4] Special briefing with IPR: Net zero transition after COP29 & US elections

10-11 Dec [5] UNEP FI Global Roundtable 2024

11 Dec [6] Unlocking capital: powering transition finance in emerging markets

17-18 Dec [7] GHG Emissions Reporting for Financial Professionals

【Green Finance Blog 2024 Autumn Special】ISSB Sustainability Reporting 2024: How Singapore and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges Compare

Alexandra Tracy, Green Finance Advisor of Friends of the Earth (HK)

I was in Singapore last week for RI Asia, which was a great event.  But it clearly reminded me how so many of us in that city and in Hong Kong always like to benchmark ourselves against each other.  No one more so than the regulators: when I was on the Listing Committee at HKEx, for example, we always had half an eye on what was going on at SGX.

As the field of sustainability disclosure regulation is changing rapidly, with new standard setting bodies, new acronyms and new rules which will affect thousands of companies across the world, it’s a good moment to look at where the two cities have got to in the process and how they stack up against each other.

ISSB: One Standard to Guide the Many

At COP 26 in 2021, many people heaved a sigh of relief at the announcement of the formation of the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which would end the “alphabet soup” of voluntary disclosure initiatives and put in their place a robust global reporting framework.  Building on the work of many of the existing initiatives, especially the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures, the ISSB began developing a set of high quality, consistent standards for sustainability disclosure.

By mid-2023, the ISSB had published its first two standards: IFRS S1 for general sustainability concerns, and IFRS S2 on climate issues.  These guidelines are intended to provide a comprehensive global baseline of sustainability disclosure standards, but national policy makers can decide how to enact them or combine them with jurisdiction specific requirements. 

Hong Kong Leading on ISSB Alignment

HKEx has been one of the earliest adopters of the ISSB’s reporting principles.  In April, the exchange published consultation conclusions on enhanced requirements for climate related disclosures under its ESG reporting framework, which will be renamed the ESG Reporting Code.  The new rules will be implemented in phases from January 2025.  In addition to mandatory disclosure of scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions, Main Board listed companies must provide information, on a comply or explain basis, about climate related risks and opportunities, governance, strategy, risk management and metrics and targets.  Main Board listed companies must also disclose scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions on a comply or explain basis.  This requirement will become mandatory for large cap companies from January 2026.  GEM listed companies are expected to make voluntary disclosures.

Singapore to Extend Reporting Mandate to Unlisted Companies

SGX published consultation conclusions in September this year on its sustainability reporting regime, including the addition of the ISSB’s climate related requirements.  Additional disclosure requirements will be implemented in phases from full year 2025, when all listed companies must provide information according to the ISSB’s climate related requirements, including disclosure of scope 1 and scope 2 greenhouse gas emissions, on a mandatory basis.  Companies will be able to report on the other “primary components” in their sustainability reports on a comply or explain basis for a further year.  SGX will review companies’ readiness and experience with the upgraded disclosure requirements before establishing an implementation roadmap for reporting scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions.

In a first for Asia, Singapore is planning to introduce the same mandatory climate related reporting requirements for large non listed companies, defined as those with annual revenue of at least SGD1 billion and total assets of at least SGD500 million for two financial years immediately preceding the current financial year.  From full year 2027, they will have to file annual climate disclosures with the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority of Singapore.

Carbon Market 4.0

Mostafa Monira Firdouse, Green Finance Advisor. Friends of the Earth (HK)

The carbon market has had its fair share of struggles over the years. For instance, when the EU Emissions Trading Scheme kicked off in 2005, it didn’t really deliver on cutting emissions as expected. On the contrary, by 2012, carbon prices crashed due to oversupply, making many projects financially unviable. Fast forward to 2023, and reputation risks took center stage when reports showed that over 90% of certain forestry credits didn’t actually reduce emissions. This has led many companies to rethink their purchases. None of the initiatives seems to have worked.

Why? What is missing in the mechanism?

Text Box: Carbon Market Trajectory

Among the setbacks facing carbon markets, top identified challenges predominantly come from macro market situation. Price volatility, pricing mechanism, international/cross-border regulation and financial policy are a few major challenges.

However, climate change is real, and carbon emission does not maintain any boundary to disrupt billions of people, biodiversity loss, malnutrition, job loss and all sorts of uncertainty. Which eventually promotes financial, social and political crimes.

Text Box: So, is it ambitious to understand that climate change and carbon emission does not maintain any boundary?
Is it hard to believe that restoring biodiversity is the only way of shared prosperity, which will not come without ensuring carbon pricing?

THE Missing Piece of Carbon Valuation Model – Carbon as Currency

Recommendations

  1. Introduce carbon as currency.
  2. Bring Financial Institutions as agent to play central role, regulated by Central Banks.
  3. Develop new trading products to ensure everyone get equal opportunity and gain fare share.
  4. Tie carbon currency as political benefit to ensure circularity.

Beneficiaries:

  1. Global leaders will be crowned to next generations.
  2. FIs can be profit making not only through social trust, but guaranteed by nature. New financial & carbon product will breed to provide funding for carbon offset projects that need support to grow.
  3. Accounting system will finally be able to see the light, be in better shape to ensure procurement, tax, profit & loss and healthy balance sheet.
  4. Financial benefit will go directly to the beneficiaries – people & nature.
  5. Soil nutrition can be restored and reduce biodiversity loss, food insecurity and price volatility.

Do you think the above suggestions are impossible to achieve? Provide your opinion in the comment section.

Keep an eye on my next interesting article, till then, ADIOS!

Nov 2024 Events on Green Finance / 2024年11月綠色金融活動一覽

Discover engaging green finance events this November 2024. Browse the calendar and register for events that align with your interests through the links below:

以上一圖看清2024年11月精彩的綠色金融活動!如欲參加及了解活動詳情,歡迎瀏覽以下網址:

6 Nov [1] BEC Net-zero Carbon Charter: Planning for Corporate Climate Transition

7 Nov [2] Chinachem Group Sustainability Conference 2024

8 Nov [3] GRESB Regional Insights 2024 – Hong Kong

11 Nov [4] COP 29 China Pavilion Side Event Forum: Advancing Transition Finance and Cross-Border Green Financing – Engaging the Public to Achieve a Net-Zero Economy

18 Nov [5] AVCJ ESG Forum

22 Nov [6] GO Green Futureproofing Green Building @ Qianhai