April 2025 Events on Green Finance / 2025年4月綠色金融活動一覽

Discover engaging green finance events this Apr 2025. Browse the calendar and register for events that align with your interests through the links below:

以上一圖看清2025年4月精彩的綠色金融活動!如欲參加及了解活動詳情,歡迎瀏覽以下網址:

1 Apr [1] SSFA Connects x TNFD: Nature as a Strategic Ally

3 Apr [2] Putting Nature on the Balance Sheet: Launch of the TNFD’s LEAP approach in Hong Kong

9 Apr [3] Sustainable Finance Taxonomies in ASEAN: Towards Regional Harmonisation

15 Apr [4] Investing in Climate Adaptation and Resilience

16 Apr [5] The Green Way Forward for a Sustainable Future Seminar Series – Seminar 1: Getting Ready for the Carbon Market

17 Apr [6] Double materiality, underlying ethical principles for investing, and performance

22 Apr [7] Earth Forum 2025: Green Capital, Global Connect – Shaping Hong Kong as a Sustainable Finance Hub

24 Apr [8] IPR/PRI Quarterly Briefing – Global Climate Policy Developments in Q4 2024 & Q1 2025

Hong Kong Can Help Bangladesh’s Garments Industry Go Green

Mostafa Monira Firdouse, Green Finance Advisor of Friends of the Earth (HK)

The garments sector is a big deal for Bangladesh’s economy, providing jobs for millions and contributing more than 11% to the GDP. Thanks to its competitive labour, trade preferences and market liberalisation following WTO membership. Many foreign investors, including those from Hong Kong, have set up garment factories in Bangladesh. This gives rise to sustained demand for textile imports, making them among the leading export markets for Hong Kong.

But with great power comes great responsibility, and the sector has been under the microscope for its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices. As the world gets more serious about sustainable and ethical fashion, it’s crucial for Bangladesh’s garments sector to step up its ESG game. Such as:

  • The garments industry needs to get efficient to use resources. This means using water and energy efficiently, cutting down on waste, and avoiding harmful chemicals. Cleaner production techniques and sticking to environmental laws are a must.
  • Worker Empowerment, strong health and safety measures through training and development programs. Such as offering skill development opportunities, promoting gender equality, and giving workers a voice in decision-making.

To meet the sustainable practice mainly depends on (i) implementing robust policy by government and by companies. (ii) Investing in technology and innovation (iii) skill development.

Hong Kong, with its advanced financial markets, strong regulatory frameworks, and expertise in sustainable practices, is in a great position to support ESG capacity building in Bangladesh’s garments sector. Here are several ways Hong Kong can help:

  1. Knowledge Transfer and Training
    • Workshops and Seminars: Organize events in Bangladesh to share best practices in ESG, covering topics like sustainable resource management, labor rights, and corporate governance.
    • Training Programs: Set up training programs for Bangladeshi garment industry professionals, run by Hong Kong-based experts, focusing on practical ESG skills.

  2. Technical Assistance and Consultancy
    • ESG Consultancy Services: Hong Kong-based firms can help develop and implement ESG strategies, conduct audits, and provide guidance on international standards.
    • Technical Support: Provide support for adopting advanced technologies that enhance sustainability, like energy-efficient machinery and water recycling systems.

  3. Financial Support and Investment
    • Green Financing: Offer green financing options like green bonds and sustainability-linked loans to Bangladeshi garment manufacturers.
    • Investment in ESG Projects: Encourage Hong Kong investors to fund ESG-focused projects in Bangladesh, including renewable energy and sustainable textile production.

  4. Collaboration and Partnerships
    • Industry Partnerships: Foster partnerships between Hong Kong and Bangladeshi garment industry associations to exchange knowledge and best practices.
    • Academic Collaboration: Promote joint research projects between universities and research institutions in both regions.

  5. Policy Advocacy and Support
    • Policy Development: Help the Bangladeshi government create policies that promote ESG practices, including regulatory frameworks and incentives.
    • Advocacy for International Standards: Support Bangladesh in adopting international ESG standards through global forums.

  6. Capacity Building Initiatives
    • Programs: Develop capacity building programs tailored to the Bangladeshi garments sector, focusing on environmental management, social responsibility, and corporate governance.
    • Mentorship and Coaching: Set up mentorship programs where Hong Kong professionals mentor Bangladeshi counterparts.

  7. Monitoring and Evaluation
    • Performance Monitoring: Help set up systems for monitoring and evaluating ESG performance, including key performance indicators (KPIs) and reporting frameworks.
    • Third-Party Audits: Facilitate third-party audits to ensure compliance with international ESG standards.

Conclusion

Hong Kong can play a big role in helping Bangladesh’s garments sector improve its ESG practices. Through knowledge transfer, technical assistance, financial support, collaboration, policy advocacy, capacity building initiatives, and monitoring and evaluation, Hong Kong can help Bangladesh become more sustainable and ethical. This collaboration can lead to a better garments industry in Bangladesh, benefiting workers, communities, and the environment while strengthening economic ties between the two regions.

【Green Finance and the Energy Transition】The Investment Gap: Regional Disparities and the Need for Global Action

Green Finance Engagement Team

The energy transition is a global challenge, but when it comes to financing, not all regions are on equal footing. While investments in clean energy continue to grow in advanced economies, emerging markets and developing economies (EMDEs) are being left further behind.

This growing disparity between regions threatens to undermine global climate goals, leaving billions of people increasingly vulnerable to the worsening impacts of climate change and energy insecurity.

In this post, we explore the regional investment gap, the barriers hindering progress in EMDEs, and how green finance can help level the playing field.

A World of Unequal Investment

The International Monetary Fund’s World Economic Outlook database divides the world into advanced economies and emerging market and developing economies, based on the main criteria of 1) per capita income level, 2) export diversification and 3) degree of integration into the global financial system.

Emerging markets and developing economies account for the majority of the global population, yet receive only a small share of global clean energy investment.

The share of clean energy investment in emerging market and developing economies outside of China accounted for just 15% of the total, even though these economies account for two-thirds of the global population and one-third of global GDP, according to the International Energy Agency (IEA)World Energy Outlook 2024.

Investment in clean energy projects increases in all parts of the world in the IEA’s Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) Scenario, but the regional imbalances mean that the required increase is particularly steep in emerging market and developing economies other than China.

In the NZE Scenario, annual spending on clean energy doubles in advanced economies as well as China by 2035 compared with 2023 levels. For other developing economies, clean energy investment needs to grow more than six-fold during the same period.

Source: IEA World Energy Outlook 2024

This means that achieving the Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE) scenario requires a dramatic increase in clean energy investments in EMDEs, where the needs are the greatest.

However, several barriers hinder investment in EMDEs. Political instability, weak regulatory frameworks, and currency volatility make projects in these regions riskier for investors. Access to affordable capital remains one of the largest barriers to investment in clean energy projects and infrastructure in many EMDEs, with financing costs in these regions at least twice as high as in advanced economies and China, according to the IEA’s World Energy Investment 2024 report.

The lack of local-currency lending pushes up borrowing costs, and high hedging costs often make this financing unaffordable to many of the least-developed countries, according to the IEA.

Many EMDEs also lack the grid infrastructure needed to integrate renewable energy at scale, while inconsistent or unclear energy policies create uncertainty that deters private investment.

Without targeted action, these challenges will deepen the divide between developed and developing economies, slowing the global energy transition. International collaboration will be essential to mobilise the necessary investments in these regions.

How Green Finance Can Bridge the Gap

To close the investment gap in EMDEs, green finance must play a central role. Here are some key solutions that could bridge the gap:

Blended finance mechanisms can reduce risks for private investors in EMDEs by combining public and private capital. For example, concessional loans from development banks can make projects in high-risk regions more attractive to private investors.

International climate funds like the Green Climate Fund (GCF) and the Climate Investment Funds (CIF) are designed to channel funding to countries and sectors most in need. These funds help EMDEs finance renewable energy projects, grid upgrades, and energy access initiatives.

Policy and regulatory support from governments in EMDEs can attract investment by creating stable, transparent regulatory environments. Policies like feed-in tariffs and tax incentives, as well as power purchase agreements, can reduce investor uncertainty.

Private sector engagement is crucial, with institutional investors such as pension funds and asset managers increasingly allocating capital toward sustainable investments. Encouraging more private sector participation in EMDEs will be critical to scaling clean energy financing.

Capacity building is essential. Beyond financing, EMDEs need technical assistance to develop bankable clean energy projects. International organisations and development banks can provide expertise to help countries design and implement effective projects.

The Cost of Inaction

Failing to close the investment gaps in EMDEs will have global consequences. Without sufficient funding, these regions risk being locked into fossil fuel dependency, which would make it virtually impossible to achieve global climate targets. Furthermore, the energy inequities between developed and developing economies would deepen, leaving billions without access to clean and affordable energy.

Green finance offers a pathway to address these disparities. By mobilising capital at scale and directing it toward high-impact projects in EMDEs, the world can ensure that no region is left behind in the energy transition.

Key Takeaways:

  • EMDEs outside China receive only 15% of global clean energy investment despite representing two-thirds of the global population
  • Investment in clean energy must grow more than six-fold in developing economies (excluding China) by 2035 to meet net-zero goals
  • Policy reforms and capacity building are crucial for attracting private investment into EMDEs

Looking Ahead

The investment gap is just one piece of the puzzle. In the next post, we’ll explore how green finance is driving the rapid expansion of renewable energy, from solar farms to wind turbines, and the critical infrastructure upgrades needed to support them.

Stay tuned as we continue to uncover the transformative power of green finance in achieving the global energy transition.

Summary of “Factor-Mimicking Portfolios for Climate Risk”

Green Finance Advisor of Friends of the Earth (HK)

Introduction

Climate change presents significant risks to the global economy, prompting investors to seek portfolios that effectively hedge against such risks. The financial services industry has responded by developing numerous funds with climate mandates. This paper introduces a methodology for constructing climate-efficient factor-mimicking portfolios (CEPs) designed to hedge climate risk.

Methodology

The authors propose a two-step approach to forming these hedging portfolios:

1. Climate Risk Index Construction: Using textual analysis of major newspapers, the authors construct climate risk indices that capture the sentiment and information regarding climate change.

2. Factor-Mimicking Portfolio Creation: The paper presents a novel method for computing factor-mimicking portfolios, enhancing traditional approaches by utilizing large-dimensional covariance matrix estimators, which improve efficiency in short sample sizes.

Empirical Analysis

The authors conduct extensive empirical tests to demonstrate the superior performance of CEPs. The findings indicate that these portfolios yield significantly higher and statistically meaningful alphas (excess returns) and betas (sensitivity to climate risk indices) when compared to traditional investment strategies.

Climate Risk and Investment Strategies

Investors increasingly recognize climate change as a non-diversifiable risk, complicating traditional hedging methods such as futures or insurance contracts. The paper emphasizes the need for investors to self-insure through carefully constructed investment portfolios. The proposed CEPs are designed to minimize variance while maximizing exposure to climate risk, achieved through a sophisticated portfolio optimization framework.

Performance Metrics

The authors measure the effectiveness of the climate-efficient portfolios using several performance metrics, including:

– Alpha: Represents the portfolio’s excess return beyond the expected return.

– Beta: Indicates the portfolio’s sensitivity to climate risk news.

– Information Ratio (IR): Measures the risk-adjusted return of the portfolio.

The results show that CEPs outperform various benchmarks, confirming their robustness and effectiveness in managing climate risk.

Portfolio Construction

The construction of CEPs involves selecting sustainable and climate-focused funds, with the process guided by the estimated covariance matrix of asset returns. The paper introduces the use of shrinkage estimators to enhance the stability of covariance estimates, particularly in scenarios with a limited number of observations.

Results and Findings

The empirical analysis reveals that the CEP approach consistently outperforms traditional portfolios. Specifically, the optimal CEP achieves an average excess return of 7.34% with a corresponding beta of 3.30. The performance is robust across different time frames and market conditions, showcasing the effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

Conclusion

The authors conclude that their climate-efficient factor-mimicking portfolios offer a powerful tool for investors looking to hedge against climate change-related risks. By combining advanced portfolio optimization techniques with a rigorous understanding of climate risk dynamics, the CEP approach delivers significant advantages over conventional investment strategies.

Implications for Investors

The findings underscore the importance of adopting innovative investment strategies that account for climate risks. As awareness of climate change continues to grow, investors are likely to demand more sophisticated financial products that facilitate effective risk management. The CEP framework not only addresses this need but also positions investors to better navigate the complexities of climate-related financial challenges.

In summary, the paper presents a thorough examination of factor-mimicking portfolios tailored for climate risk, advancing the field of sustainable finance by providing a practical solution for investors.

Reference

Factor-Mimicking Portfolios for Climate Risk https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2024.2332164

Anthony Cheung Joins Independent Standards Board of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol: A Milestone for Hong Kong’s Global Climate Influence

Friends of the Earth (Hong Kong) is proud to announce that our Vice Chairperson and Green Finance Convenor, Mr Anthony Cheung, has been appointed as a member of the Independent Standards Board (ISB) of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol (GHGP).

This appointment marks a significant milestone not only for Mr Cheung but also for Hong Kong’s growing presence in the global sustainability landscape.

Global Standards with Far-Reaching Impact

The GHGP is the organisation behind the world’s most widely used greenhouse gas accounting standards. Its classification framework has become the foundation for virtually all emissions calculation methodologies used today, most notably the Scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions categories:

· Scope 1: Direct emissions from owned or controlled sources

· Scope 2: Indirect emissions from purchased electricity

· Scope 3: All other indirect emissions occurring in a company’s value chain

These categories have been adopted globally by corporations, governments, and organisations as the standard approach to carbon accounting and reporting.

The Role of the Independent Standards Board

The Independent Standards Board comprises leading global experts in climate science, corporate sustainability, and environmental policy. As the GHGP’s decision-making entity, the ISB will:

· Oversee the standards development process

· Review and approve GHG Protocol Standards

· Make decisions related to the content of standards

Mr Cheung joins this distinguished group at a crucial time when greenhouse gas accounting standards are becoming increasingly important for global climate action.

Bridging Hong Kong with Global Standards

“This appointment represents a significant opportunity to align Hong Kong’s sustainability standards with international frameworks,” said Mr Cheung. “I look forward to bringing Hong Kong and mainland China’s perspectives to the global stage, ensuring our regional context is considered in the development of universal standards.”

Mr Cheung’s appointment comes as Hong Kong continues to develop as a green finance hub in Asia. His position on the ISB will help facilitate knowledge exchange between local practices and global standards, supporting Hong Kong’s transition to a low-carbon economy

while ensuring that local businesses can seamlessly integrate with international sustainability reporting requirements.

Looking Forward

As climate reporting becomes increasingly standardised worldwide, having Hong Kong representation at this high level ensures our region’s voice is heard in shaping the future of global carbon accounting frameworks.

We congratulate Mr Cheung on this prestigious appointment and look forward to the positive impact his expertise will bring to both global standards development and Hong Kong’s sustainability journey.

For more information about the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and its standards, visit https://ghgprotocol.org/