May 2025 Events on Green Finance / 2025年5月綠色金融活動一覽

Discover engaging green finance events this May 2025. Browse the calendar and register for events that align with your interests through the links below:

以上一圖看清2025年5月精彩的綠色金融活動!如欲參加及了解活動詳情,歡迎瀏覽以下網址:

8 May [1] Availability and Credibility of ESG Data

13 May [2] Development of ESG Information Disclosure Regulations in China

21 May [3] SFi Impact Summit 2025: The Power of Momentum

28 May [4] A Nexus of Sustainability, Financial Markets, and Scientific Innovation

28 May [5] Ocean Investment Protocol: Aligning Financial Flows with the Transition to a Sustainable Ocean Economy

Bridging the Green Premium in Sustainable Transportation

[Certified ESG Analyst Insights Sharing] Spencer Liu, CESGA

In the 2020s, momentum behind sustainable transportation is unmistakable – from electric vehicles (EVs) to charging infrastructure, we’ve seen a groundswell of adoption and investment. Yet the full sustainability potential across transport modes remains untapped. Emerging solutions like sustainable aviation fuels (SAF), green methanol and ammonia, and e-fuels are gaining some ground, but they continue to carry a green premium: higher capital expenditures and operating costs compared to their fossil-fuel counterparts.

Finance plays an inseparable role in closing this gap. The ability to scale these technologies hinges not only on innovation, but also on access to patient, risk-tolerant capital that can support early deployment, aggregate demand, and eventually drive costs down.

In an ideal world, carbon emissions would be fairly priced, regulatory signals would be clear and stable, and green investments would offer both climate and financial returns. Over time, economies of scale and technological learning curves would shrink the green premium. But in today’s fragmented global context, recent developments are pushing us further away from that equilibrium.

Take maritime shipping as an example. The International Maritime Organization (IMO) recently advanced plans to introduce a global cap on carbon emissions for ocean shipping, including a significant penalty for ships exceeding carbon intensity thresholds starting from 2028. While this is a major step toward internalizing emissions costs, it’s far from universally supported. For example, the current US administration has voiced opposition to these mechanisms, citing concerns about competitiveness and economic burden, adding uncertainty for investors and operators alike.

In addition, an emerging wave of trade protectionism – reflected in rising tariffs on goods – is disrupting supply chains and delaying the cost reductions that green transport technologies, such as EVs, batteries, and clean tech components, depend on. These measures not only raise the cost of deploying clean technologies but also undermine returns on critical infrastructure – such as EV charging networks, battery recycling plants, and low-carbon fuel bunkering hubs – by creating uncertainty around future utilization and demand.

The result is a prolonged vicious cycle that keeps the green premium high and adoption low: green solutions are expensive not just because of high costs, but because the returns are distant, uncertain, and vulnerable to political risks.

  • Trade barriers raise deployment costs, making early-stage projects harder to finance and scale.
  • Infrastructure build-out lags behind, reinforcing hesitancy. For instance, why commit to deploying electric heavy-duty trucks if fast-charging hubs or grid capacity are not in place?
  • Fragmented carbon pricing mechanisms distorts competition. Without consistent, global participation, some players bear the cost of decarbonization while others bypass/ create arbitrages against it.
  • Green infrastructure requires long-duration capital, yet returns are often insufficiently de-risked to meet financiers’ thresholds to provide credit.

Despite these challenges, today presents a critical moment for leadership. The costs of inaction – regulatory lock-ins, stranded assets, and geopolitical exposure – are rising. At the same time, first movers in clean transportation are shaping the next decade of supply chains, trade corridors, and capital flows. Here is what businesses and financiers can do to stay ahead:

1. Anchor investments with strategic intent
Businesses should view green investments as enablers of long-term competitiveness, not just short-term returns. Investing in SAF or green bunkering infrastructure, for example, may not yield immediate margins, but helps secure future market access, compliance readiness, and brand value. This also applies to financiers: transition-aligned portfolios require reallocation of capital now, recognizing future fuel cost shifts and regulatory tightening. Integrating forward-looking metrics – such as internal carbon pricing or emissions trajectories – into credit portfolios is key.

2. Deploy blended finance and de-risking tools
Public-private capital stacks can unlock projects that otherwise fail conventional hurdle rates. Financiers should work with multilateral banks, public agencies, and philanthropic funds to design blended finance structures with concessional or first-loss tranches. These tools have proven effective in clean energy and are highly transferable to transportation – from bus electrification to green port infrastructure.

3. Shape sustainable financing principles through cross-market collaboration
Businesses and financiers can work together across borders to establish consistent aligned sustainable financing principles. Collaborative efforts – such as the Poseidon Principles for climate-aligned shipping finance – demonstrate how cross-market standards can reduce regulatory fragmentation, increase investment predictability, and create a level playing field.

4. Aggregate demand through alliances
Pooling commitments through coalitions like the First Movers Coalition, Cargo Owners for Zero Emission Vessels (coZEV), and the Sustainable Freight Buyers Alliance helps justify infrastructure investments and reduce counterparty risk. Demand aggregation (while complying with competition laws and regulations) increases certainty for financiers and enables lower-cost capital deployment.

The transition to sustainable transportation is undeniably complex.  Timely investment in infrastructure and technologies, alongside collective demand, would be necessary for such transition to scale and green premium to be reduced or potentially eliminated.  For financiers and businesses, the opportunity now lies in designing strategies that reward leadership, hedge against delay, and build the systems we will depend on tomorrow.

This article is written by a holder of the EFFAS Certified Environmental, Social, and Governance Analyst (CESGA). CESGA is a globally recognised qualification whose prominence continues to grow worldwide. CESGA has recently achieved a significant milestone as the first programme accredited by European standard setter EFRAG for compliance with the ESRS sustainability disclosure requirements in the EU (mandatory from 2025). For enrolment details, please visit https://bit.ly/40chuOR.

【Green Finance and the Energy Transition Series】Scaling Renewable Energy: The Role of Green Finance in Powering the Future

Green Finance Engagement Team

The renewable energy sector is growing at an unprecedented pace as the world races to meet climate targets.

Renewable power generation reached a historic milestone, providing 32% of global electricity in 2024. Investments in renewable energy also hit a record US$728 billion last year, driving global investments in the low-carbon energy transition to surpass the US$2 trillion threshold for the first time in 2024, according to BloombergNEF’s Energy Transition Investment Trends 2025 report.

However, a significant financing gap remains, particularly in emerging markets where only one-fifth of global clean energy investments is currently taking place. The global share of renewable energy will also need to nearly double by 2030 to achieve net-zero emissions by mid-century.

The third instalment in our series explores how green finance is driving the deployment of renewable energy and examines the challenges that lie ahead.

The Renewable Energy Revolution

According to the International Energy Agency (IEA) Renewables 2024 report, renewable energy needs to provide nearly 60% of global electricity generation by 2030 in the Net Zero Emissions (NZE) scenario. Renewable power generation provided a record 32% of global electricity last year, according to energy think tank Ember’s Global Electricity Review 2025.

Global renewable power generation capacity is projected to grow 2.3 times by 2030, adding around 5,500 gigawatts (GW) of new capacity, according to the IEA’s World Energy Outlook 2024. Solar photovoltaic (PV) and wind power is expected to dominate this growth, accounting for 95% of all renewable capacity growth through the end of this decade.

Annual clean energy investment will also need to more than double to US$4.5 trillion by the early 2030s to align with climate goals. Moreover, for every dollar spent on renewable power, only 60 cents are spent on grids and storage. Investments in grids and storage is expected to reach parity with that in renewable generation by the 2040s, creating a balanced and resilient energy system, according to the IEA.

How Green Finance is Driving Renewable Energy Deployment

Green finance has been accelerating the adoption of renewable energy through several key mechanisms.

Equity and debt issuances for climate and energy transition purposes totaled US$1 trillion in 2024, providing crucial capital for renewable energy projects worldwide, according to BloombergNEF.

Blended finance, which uses funding from public and philanthropic sources to mobilise additional private sector investment, has also achieved notable success in Sub-Saharan Africa, attracting 61% of global concessional financing in 2020, according to The State of Blended Finance 2021 report by Convergence.

The Daybreak project in Nigeria shows how blended finance helped provide distributed renewable energy solutions as an alternative to diesel generators for commercial and industrial customers, in a nation with an unreliable grid supply and frequent blackouts. The International Finance Corporation (IFC) provided US$20 million equivalent in financing to Daybreak in 2021, enabling Nigeria’s second largest provider of commercial solar hybrid power to increase its solar photovoltaic capacity fourfold, helping to catalyse the nation’s distributed renewable energy sector.

The Cost of Delay

Failing to scale renewable energy deployment would have severe consequences:

  • Missing climate targets becomes virtually certain
  • Energy security risks increase, particularly in the context of ongoing geopolitical tensions
  • Economic opportunities in the clean energy economy are lost

The IEA’s 2024 World Energy Outlook emphasises that while global carbon dioxide emissions are projected to peak before 2030, without a sharp decline afterwards, the world is on course for a rise of 2.4°C in global average temperatures by 2100, well above the Paris Agreement goal of limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

Green finance provides the tools to accelerate deployment and ensure these consequences are avoided.

Key Takeaways

  • Renewable energy must scale rapidly to meet climate goals, with capacity projected to grow 2.3 times by 2030
  • Green finance innovations are crucial for accelerating deployment, with blended finance showing particular promise in emerging markets
  • The imbalance between investments in renewable energy generation versus grids and storage persists, but must be corrected to ensure system resilience

Looking Ahead

The transformation of our energy system depends on successfully scaling renewable energy deployment. As highlighted in our previous posts on financing the energy transition and regional investment disparities, green financing mechanisms are proving their effectiveness in mobilising capital for clean energy. In the next post, we’ll examine how green finance is supporting the critical infrastructure needed to integrate renewables, including transmission, storage, and smart grid technologies.

Stay tuned as we continue to explore how green finance is powering the clean energy revolution.

【Green and Sustainable Finance Spotlight Series】Carbon Markets and Carbon Pricing Mechanisms

Green Finance Engagement Team

The second primer in our Green and Sustainable Finance Spotlight Series gives an overview of carbon markets and explores the mechanisms that put a price on greenhouse gas emissions. Carbon markets are becoming increasingly important in reducing carbon emissions globally, so understanding how they work is crucial to making informed financial decisions.

What are Carbon Markets and Carbon Pricing Mechanisms?

Carbon markets and pricing mechanisms assign financial value to greenhouse gas emissions, giving institutions an incentive to reduce their environmental footprint.

These systems enable the trading of carbon credits, which represent verified emissions reductions. Transactions usually occur between organisations that can reduce emissions at lower costs and those that find it more expensive to do so.

The main carbon pricing approaches include:

  • Emissions Trading Systems (ETS): Market-based systems where businesses operate under emissions limits and can buy or sell allowances based on their pollution levels.
  • Carbon Taxes: Direct fees charged on emissions, typically set by governments.
  • Voluntary Carbon Markets: Platforms where companies choose to buy carbon credits to offset their emissions.

Key Market Developments Around the World

Market Size and Growth

According to MSCI, over 6,200 carbon projects were registered across major international crediting registries by the end of 2024. These projects issued 305 million tonnes of carbon credits in 2024 and have now issued more than 2.1 billion credits since the Paris Agreement was signed in late 2016. Carbon credits worth a total of US$1.4 billion were used by corporations last year, slightly below 2022’s peak of US$1.7 billion.

With more companies setting climate goals and favourable policy developments, including the finalisation of the UN Paris Agreement’s Article 6 rules for international carbon trading at COP29, the market is expected to grow significantly.  

MSCI projects the global carbon credit market could rise in value to at least US$7 billion, and as much as US$35 billion, by 2030. By 2050, the market is estimated to be worth between US$45 and US$250 billion.

Source: MSCI

Why Should Companies and Investors Care?

For Companies:

  • Provides cost-effective ways to meet climate goals
  • Creates potential revenue from emissions reduction projects
  • Helps manage carbon costs and comply with regulation

For Investors:

  • Carbon markets present new investment opportunities
  • Pathway to reduce carbon exposure in investment portfolios
  • Improve understanding of carbon-related financial risks

Getting Started

Companies can:

  1. Assess Their Carbon Exposure:
    • Identify where emissions come from
    • Find the best opportunities to reduce emissions
    • Understand the relevant carbon pricing rules that apply to them
  2. Develop Carbon Strategies:
    • Set an internal price on carbon within the organisation
    • Look for ways to generate carbon credits
    • Consider the environmental impact when making investment decisions

Investors can:

  1. Participate in Carbon Markets:
    • Learn about different carbon trading systems
    • Evaluate the quality of carbon credits
    • Consider investments in market infrastructure
  2. Integrate Carbon in Portfolios
    • Include carbon pricing in investment models
    • Engage with companies about their carbon strategies
    • Develop investment approaches aligned with net-zero goals

Conclusion

Carbon markets and carbon pricing mechanisms serve as essential tools for channelling global investments towards greenhouse gas reduction. As these markets evolve and expand, understanding their dynamics becomes increasingly critical for both effective financial decision-making and meaningful climate action.